• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Is the Earth flat?

Is the Earth Flat


  • Total voters
    28

Turry Fawks

Dean of Dog Piss Studies at Waterlooniversity
Forum Clout
29,168
My presupposition is that GPS functions under the currently accepted model of physics, so if you were to replace this model of physics with an alternative one, it would have to be functionally and mathematically equivalent/identical since GPS works. This doesn't have merit to you? then I appreciate your input.

The question still stands for me.
I mean it could just be triangulation from terrestrial radio sources or sattilloons. The physics doesn't change.
 

CuntFucker .

Forum Clout
25,038
Your bender started today. You were either too broke to get high yesterday, or you were crashing from your last meth-fuel. Just reminding you, your patterns are recognized. Back to ignore.
Pattern Recognition Boq has a lot of brain power. Seriously though, this retard couldn't find a 9-year-old to marry him.
 

CuntFucker .

Forum Clout
25,038
Let's keep it on topic, miserable pedophiles and sodomites.
1727214382883.png
 

RoTheHo69

Step off, B.
Forum Clout
32,900
Unless you know something that I don't
Very roughly generalize how Glonass and GPS works up to and including the geodetic datum. I don't know what you know, that's what I know on an admittedly very rough level.
Now proceeding to proceed with that understanding explain to me how that technology is feasible including the geodetic datum and coordinates without an immense multinational conspiracy that goes as low as some dime-a-dozen electrical engineers in China and every radio amateur globally, or alternatively if there's no far-reaching conspiracy I'm asking how this alternative physics can be completely functionally identical to the degree that our current technology based on our current understanding can function as it does. That's my question.

If you think none of it is relevant then we're not on the same page. What can I say? I don't want to be a prick about it honestly.
 
Top