- Forum Clout
- 30,111
The data was pretty clear about six months post rollout, at least here in Canada. The government had already released the mortality rates of covid broken down by demographics (age, sex) and they collated the risks from the jab based on those same demographics. I don't know that they ever put them in one place but all a curious person had to do was compare those two sets of numbers to get a rough idea of the risk/benefit analysis for themselves.before the off topic vaccine phds get in here to @ me. The covid vaccine did cause increased instances of myocarditis , especially in younger people. The issue has always been , does the benefits outweight the risks. The problem was the government lied, as they, you might want to sit down for this... always do. This time it just happened to be about something global and affecting everyone.
Companies lied and manipulated data for some reason or another to benefit their company. Different parties and governments lied and misled people to benefit their party.
Maybe the vaccine ended up being more harmful overall than covid was or would have been. There's no way to know because now fuckign data has become politiced. Since you can't really verify the data, as far as I can tell, making a decision either way is retarded.
The way it broke down for us was that I was at equivalent risk for the Rona or the jab. The missus was more at risk from the jab by a small margin and for the kids it could only possibly be harmful since their risk from Rona was basically zero. That's not to say I think it would definitely have harmed them but it could not have helped them.
Long story short none of us got the shot.
P.S. Nice epistemic nihilism, stupit
Last edited: