- Forum Clout
- 23,248
Nice repeating yourself for over a dozen pages, Pat.
Enjoy the dismissal. We. Will.
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
- Thread starter Cumtown Fags
- Start date
Enjoy the dismissal. We. Will.
- Forum Clout
- 64,307
I'm on page 2 and it really seems like he wrote most of it, it's way too dramatic and emotional.
This lawsuit is about officers ignoring the information in front of their noses! Nobody who graduated law school would write that.
- Forum Clout
- 18,450
He wrote a lot of it for sure. Simple grammatical mistakes, italics for emphasis, histrionic rambling and repition. He definitely paid a lawyer to look it over though.
- Forum Clout
- 23,248
A lawyer definitely wrote part of it. Pat doesn't know how to spell curtilage let alone know the definition of it.
- Forum Clout
- 35,444
Is it 52 or 46?
- Forum Clout
- 23,101
I want to sign up for Twitter and constantly accuse Rick of swatting me. I have exactly as much proof of this as he has against us. I hate Twitter too much to follow through with this but god he annoys me.Is it 52 or 46?
- Forum Clout
- 64,307
It's weird but yeah. This was clearly written by a lawyer:
Quoting court cases and using unbiased language.
But then there's this:
Let me tell you EXACTLY what the swatters were thinking. "Without delving into the gritty details".
It really makes the entire brief really confusing, switching from legalese to Patrick's verbose storytelling.
- Forum Clout
- 42,112
lol to whoever the rascal who did this
The incident where the cops handcuffed him and he yelled like a crazy woman is the first swatting he cites as a 4th Amendment violation. Can’t wait for the police footage to be admitted as evidence. That audio from a Facebook neighbor is all we have!
The incident where the cops handcuffed him and he yelled like a crazy woman is the first swatting he cites as a 4th Amendment violation. Can’t wait for the police footage to be admitted as evidence. That audio from a Facebook neighbor is all we have!
- Forum Clout
- 98,525
Nikki is writing these using GPT like she does the blog posts she charges people for (more on that later)
ofc not the "facts" of their particular case but paragraphs that aren't about special boy's special situation test positive for GPT
ofc not the "facts" of their particular case but paragraphs that aren't about special boy's special situation test positive for GPT
Last edited:
- Forum Clout
- 48,032
Oh my God, he eclipsed the last one with this 29 page effort. And it completely reads like Pat wrote every single word. No law cited, or case precedent, just NO CHILD, I AM SPECIAL. This is pure hilarity.
- Forum Clout
- 64,307
This is interesting.
First of all "consider a thought experiment" ugh.
But more importantly, Patrick says that a bomb threat was called into Miller Park during the Brewer's home opener, and includes the following article as proof:
Only problem... there's zero mention of any bomb threat or any other incident in the article. Nada.
He's literally assuming people won't do the research and just take his word when the article says nothing of the sort. It only talks about how Milwaukee was in high spirits, excited for the home opener and blowout win.
IANAL but you can't do that, right? Lying and putting "this article definitively states there was a bomb threat" when it doesn't?
First of all "consider a thought experiment" ugh.
But more importantly, Patrick says that a bomb threat was called into Miller Park during the Brewer's home opener, and includes the following article as proof:
Replay: Brewers 10, New York Mets 0; it's a blowout in home-opening victory
The Brewers return to American Family Field for their 2023 home opener Monday against the New York Mets. Follow here for game updates.
www.jsonline.com
Only problem... there's zero mention of any bomb threat or any other incident in the article. Nada.
He's literally assuming people won't do the research and just take his word when the article says nothing of the sort. It only talks about how Milwaukee was in high spirits, excited for the home opener and blowout win.
IANAL but you can't do that, right? Lying and putting "this article definitively states there was a bomb threat" when it doesn't?
- Forum Clout
- 32,829
Yeah I was going to say, Rick or Nikki clearly wrote the first two sections at the very least. You can tell no lawyer wrote that.
- Forum Clout
- 262
We've only had to hire a lawyer once for something and they were able to reach a resolution without filing anything, is it normal for lawyers to let you write your own filings? lol. "Hey, I know you went to law school but let me sperg on for 27 paragraphs like this is Twitter."
- Forum Clout
- 1,683
He's fucking insane.This is interesting.
View attachment 218466
First of all "consider a thought experiment" ugh.
But more importantly, Patrick says that a bomb threat was called into Miller Park during the Brewer's home opener, and includes the following article as proof:
Replay: Brewers 10, New York Mets 0; it's a blowout in home-opening victory
The Brewers return to American Family Field for their 2023 home opener Monday against the New York Mets. Follow here for game updates.www.jsonline.com
Only problem... there's zero mention of any bomb threat or any other incident in the article. Nada.
He's literally assuming people won't do the research and just take his word when the article says nothing of the sort. It only talks about how Milwaukee was in high spirits, excited for the home opener and blowout win.
IANAL but you can't do that, right? Lying and putting "this article definitively states there was a bomb threat" when it doesn't?
- Forum Clout
- 32,829
Wouldn’t there be a police report if that actually happened? Why even mention this at all, it has zero to do with this case? Fucking mongoloids.
- Forum Clout
- 18,450
- Forum Clout
- 17,451
It seems like being a snarky twat in legal documents isn't a good strategy but what the fawk do I know?
- Forum Clout
- 64,307
It's to prove, and I quote the brief, "every officer in Milwaukee was aware of Mr. Tomlinson's issues with his harassers".
He put in a legal document what a special, important, famous boy he is. Every officer knows me, child.
- Forum Clout
- 268,459
This question had been asked a few time. What was the gap in time from when he warned the police he was going to get swatted to when it actually happened.
Thats a new detail
Yet they added like 10 individual officers to the case
You mean when he became hostile at the officers and they had to detain him?
How does he know that this is what the dispatch noted?
This backing up torswats claims on how he had to eventually get a response from them. Does that mean his claims that pat had swatted himself are true too? Speculate.
Im assuming pats lawyers got the dispatch recordings since they keep adding extra notes of being advised pats location was probably not a real call.
Doesnt "seizing" refer to taking property and not people? Wouldnt that just be called detaining?
" Whatever this is" That totally sounds like Pat wrote this or at least not a lawyer.
Had the throw in a brewers reference
Thats a new detail
Yet they added like 10 individual officers to the case
You mean when he became hostile at the officers and they had to detain him?
How does he know that this is what the dispatch noted?
This backing up torswats claims on how he had to eventually get a response from them. Does that mean his claims that pat had swatted himself are true too? Speculate.
Im assuming pats lawyers got the dispatch recordings since they keep adding extra notes of being advised pats location was probably not a real call.
Doesnt "seizing" refer to taking property and not people? Wouldnt that just be called detaining?
" Whatever this is" That totally sounds like Pat wrote this or at least not a lawyer.
Had the throw in a brewers reference
- Forum Clout
- 17,451