• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Robinson et al v. City of Milwaukee et al

Rick Roblinson

Sausage-Fingered Vulgarian
Forum Clout
17,396
Probably already been said and this got a chuckle out of me for some reason, but they want a jury for this

View attachment 185646
They know a judge would see right through the bullshit. So they want to try and dupe 12 retards who couldn't figure out how to get out of jury duty into feeling bad for them and handing them a win.
 

Sue Lightning

IS SHE TALKING ABOUT ME?
Forum Clout
118,833
I wonder why the fuck these lawyers take these jobs where their plaintiff obviously has no case. Are they just stupid? Or are they grifting? If they’re grifting, is that worth their reputation? It also assumes the lawyer is being paid up front rather than on the agreement of a settlement. But if theres no case…theres no settlement. I just don’t get it. Is it not in their ethical code or whatever to not string along clients?
 

cachorro

Forum Clout
5,728
I wonder why the fuck these lawyers take these jobs where their plaintiff obviously has no case. Are they just stupid? Or are they grifting? If they’re grifting, is that worth their reputation? It also assumes the lawyer is being paid up front rather than on the agreement of a settlement. But if theres no case…theres no settlement. I just don’t get it. Is it not in their ethical code or whatever to not string along clients?
Patrick isn’t getting any lawyers that work on contingency for this shit. That’s all I’m saying.
 

BoomerSperg

Forum Clout
23,236
I wonder why the fuck these lawyers take these jobs where their plaintiff obviously has no case. Are they just stupid? Or are they grifting? If they’re grifting, is that worth their reputation? It also assumes the lawyer is being paid up front rather than on the agreement of a settlement. But if theres no case…theres no settlement. I just don’t get it. Is it not in their ethical code or whatever to not string along clients?
I just assume that they're taking the money up front and have no reputation to lose. Law schools were graduating 10s of thousands of more leeches than society needed, per year, just under a decade ago. Back in 2015 you couldn't read about anything law related without someone sounding off how there were way too many of them.

Plenty of these losers around
 

Jenna

very demure very cutesy very mindful very modest
Forum Clout
64,296
The Strang in Strang Bradley is Dean Strang, famous for representing Steven Avery in the Netflix documentary Making a Murderer.

Of all the attorneys in the state of Wisconsin, he went to the law firm known for pissing off law enforcement so much they made a documentary alleging the cops were so mad at Steven, they framed him for murder.

This thing just gets stupider and stupider.

1540911983-dean-strang-jerry-buting-making-a-murderer-2-1-1024x621.jpg
 

cachorro

Forum Clout
5,728
I just assume that they're taking the money up front and have no reputation to lose. Law schools were graduating 10s of thousands of more leeches than society needed, per year, just under a decade ago. Back in 2015 you couldn't read about anything law related without someone sounding off how there were way too many of them.

Plenty of these losers around
People don’t realize that the vast majority of independent and small practice lawyers are closer to Saul Goodman than Harvey Specter. These niggas get through the pipeline with every shortcut imaginable (including, perhaps, a few of our own brothermen!) and when they get rejected from jobs at real firms because their degree doesn’t have Stanford or Harvard written on it they go apeshit.

There’s a reason ambulance chaser is so ubiquitous in our language.
 

Jims_Maroon_Pants

Joe's Geek Squad Technician
Forum Clout
65,558
I'm going to go with 2A. The city decides to settle for like $50,000-75,000 (wild guess). This would be a great deal for Pat. But Pat is stubborn and stupid and refuses to accept the settlement. So it goes to trial and Pat loses, getting no money but owing his new attorneys money.

At least, that's my on-the-record prediction. Reading the whole document, it's pretty obvious that no serious attorney gave Pat and Niki the time of day on this ridiculous case, so they had to settle for an attorney stupid enough to actually put his name at the end of this foolish lawsuit. Anyone competent would be embarrassed to write their client is a victim of domestic terrorism at the hands of online "bullies" while providing literally zero evidence to support that claim.
I'd agree with you if he was a various brown. He's a white guy so he ain't getting shit
 

Cygnus Nana X-1

Forum Clout
16,581
Why would a city just settle something like this? What is the police force supposed to do? I'm not saying it can't or won't happen but I think the notion that they'll just pay then to go away doesn't make sense. I'm sure it's been brought up already but wouldn't it set them up for everyone suing for everything all the time? They're responding to the calls whether they're fake or not.

Unless the police force is swaTTing fatty themselves I think it would be in their best interest to defend what they're doing. This is why the swats are complete faggotry no matter who's doing it. What a waste of resources.

Also, it looks like Pat's legal team simply signed off and inputted what Pat and Niki wrote to them into a legal document. Yes, of course thats what lawsuit is but there's so much backstory and inconsistencies that they could question them on. I mean, they surely have a signature page where Pat and Niki swear it's all true and that the legal team takes it as such and gets paid regardless of what comes out? Where does he find find these lawyers? Oh, right.
 

Jenna

very demure very cutesy very mindful very modest
Forum Clout
64,296
People don’t realize that the vast majority of independent and small practice lawyers are closer to Saul Goodman than Harvey Specter. These niggas get through the pipeline with every shortcut imaginable (including, perhaps, a few of our own brothermen!) and when they get rejected from jobs at real firms because their degree doesn’t have Stanford or Harvard written on it they go apeshit.

There’s a reason ambulance chaser is so ubiquitous in our language.

It's not just some random ambulance chaser. Like Carrie Goldberg, he went to arguably the biggest "celebrity" law firm in the state of Wisconsin.

Keep in mind, this is not the law firm who negotiated the financial payout for Avery spending 18 years in prison on a rape he didn't commit.

This is the law firm that unsuccessfully represented him in the murder of Teresa Halbach, then cried that the cops organized a frame job after Avery was sent to prison.

But muh lawyer was on Megyn Kelly, therefore he is worth every penny, child.

0.jpg
 
Top