• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

Sigmund Freud and Karl Marx are the most destructive people in the history of "Western" society

Turk February

Our experiences exceed yours.
Forum Clout
49,370
What Pol Pot did was very wrong but in the context of communism it made as much sense as anything else.
Keep in mind he was toppled and killed by Vietnamese communists. So they have some variety. They can't all be bad.
 

Turry Fawks

Dean of Dog Piss Studies at Waterlooniversity
Forum Clout
28,948
I'm just glad they were a diverse bunch of rapacious nihilists. That means their hearts were in the right place and they were really trying.
 

Turk February

Our experiences exceed yours.
Forum Clout
49,370
I'm just glad they were a diverse bunch of rapacious nihilists. That means their hearts were in the right place and they were really trying.
They murdered a really good singer whose name escapes me but I did a whole stream on. The Khmer Rouge can go fuck, just for that.
 

Mustard

Like a charmless Wyzz
Forum Clout
3,352
Kantian ethics posit that a man should do right regardless of whether or not he knows what right is because it exists outside himself. This is a really dangerous idea.
e0f86e141dfd3b6a904e6a38d8d7f5c9.jpg
 

Harry Powell

not a fan of comedy, I’m a fan of cruelty
Forum Clout
93,011
I think Marx is widely misinterpreted. Roughly, he believed there were four necessary economic systems for humanity to go through, and that these stages were largely associated with technology and industry. We begin with slavery, then serfdoms, then capitalism, and he believed the endpoint of the Industrial Revolution would inevitably lead to communism. In his view it wasn’t an alternative to anything, it was the inevitable next stage and it would happen whether anyone wanted it to or not.
 

Turk February

Our experiences exceed yours.
Forum Clout
49,370
I think Marx is widely misinterpreted. Roughly, he believed there were four necessary economic systems for humanity to go through, and that these stages were largely associated with technology and industry. We begin with slavery, then serfdoms, then capitalism, and he believed the endpoint of the Industrial Revolution would inevitably lead to communism. In his view it wasn’t an alternative to anything, it was the inevitable next stage and it would happen whether anyone wanted it to or not.
The reason he is so widely misunderstood is intellectuals went "wait, this tells people to dethrone us' so academics intentionally started teaching him wrong.
 
Forum Clout
3,962
What is it with this, IDK how you say it, "tikkun olan," or collectivist gay shit. Combined with "I can see inside your soul and know you better than you know yourself bc I'm so superior and bc SCIENCE!!!!!!!!111!!!!!111!!!" That literally did not exist before the 19th Century. You would have been killed instantly if you EVER talked to anyone like that.

Sri Jesus said literally the opposite of that. He said to be humble, and be concerned with LOCAL cultural spheres, not any of this "save the world" bullshit. Save it for the Mahajanas.


Go to mass, cunt.
 

JoeCumiawearsDIAPERS

DMANIAC
Forum Clout
50,003
I think Marx is widely misinterpreted. Roughly, he believed there were four necessary economic systems for humanity to go through, and that these stages were largely associated with technology and industry. We begin with slavery, then serfdoms, then capitalism, and he believed the endpoint of the Industrial Revolution would inevitably lead to communism. In his view it wasn’t an alternative to anything, it was the inevitable next stage and it would happen whether anyone wanted it to or not.
Does he elaborate on what happens after communism? Eventually technology innovation will stop and productivity plummets because nobody gives a shit since .gov owns the risk. This would lead to shit products, brain drain to other countries, and probably shortages.

I guess maybe it’s just back to straight up slavery at that point, maybe with a purge or two in between.
 

Turk February

Our experiences exceed yours.
Forum Clout
49,370
At least someone, somewhere sells his shitty manifesto for a profit. Nice philosophy stupid
The Icelandic group Hatari captured this spirit perfect in dead pan saying "our record label told us we can help crush capitalism if we sell enough buttons and shirts"
 

Turry Fawks

Dean of Dog Piss Studies at Waterlooniversity
Forum Clout
28,948
I think Marx is widely misinterpreted. Roughly, he believed there were four necessary economic systems for humanity to go through, and that these stages were largely associated with technology and industry. We begin with slavery, then serfdoms, then capitalism, and he believed the endpoint of the Industrial Revolution would inevitably lead to communism. In his view it wasn’t an alternative to anything, it was the inevitable next stage and it would happen whether anyone wanted it to or not.
He definitely believed that a proletarian revolution was necessary but kind of wink-wink-nudge-nudged the when and how of it. He ennnnnnticed them
 
Top