• Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

WhY DoEsN'T qUaSi pOsT NoW tHaT ThE QuAsH Is fInIsHeD

Forum Clout
108,284
explain to the folks at home what legal grounds does Quasi have to drag the child-lovers at SFWA into this. No way funding a fat faggot with bitch tits leaves them on the hook for the judgement debt, so what is it? Unless Pat signed some contract with SFWA stating so and showed it to Jen, or there's some other missing piece of the puzzle, I fail to understand this
Never doubt Jerry Jen's ability to pinch a penny. Man looks like a triad knee cracker.
 

NoBacon

An honourable man.
Forum Clout
112,887
explain to the folks at home what legal grounds does Quasi have to drag the child-lovers at SFWA into this. No way funding a fat faggot with bitch tits leaves them on the hook for the judgement debt, so what is it? Unless Pat signed some contract with SFWA stating so and showed it to Jen, or there's some other missing piece of the puzzle, I fail to understand this

you can’t just fund peoples lawsuits and not be liable for repercussions, otherwise people could just maliciously fund anyones retarded legal vendettas purely to fuck with opponents or business rivals.

if they get it in writing they funded Pat then Jerry can go after them for the judgments.
 

RobertMewler

Forum Clout
96,150
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
7. Plaintiff incorporates the previous paragraphs of this Complaint by reference as if fully restated herein.
8. On or about February 5, 2020, Defendant guest, anonymously created and published a shaming-forum website, www.onaforums.net, exclusively dedicated to shaming, defaming and harassing Plaintiff.

This isn't even factual. Man, the SFWA's lawyers are fucking tards. We talk about kikes and niggers too.
Sohn literally attached Pig's original complaint to this one as an Exhibit. Now even more people will read that Pat is a pedophile rapist who grinds black children into pepperoni.
 
Forum Clout
20,283
CaringBoldCurlew-max-1mb.gif
 

Beavis

Forum Clout
2,488
you can’t just fund peoples lawsuits and not be liable for repercussions, otherwise people could just maliciously fund anyones retarded legal vendettas purely to fuck with opponents or business rivals.

if they get it in writing they funded Pat then Jerry can go after them for the judgments.
Pat should squeal to Jerry if it puts the SFWA on the hook for fees. Hell tell him they put him up to it.
 

AntSucks

★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
Forum Clout
20,634
Having now read the quash in full I'm convinced more than ever they funded the lawsuit. They call it "overbroad" but the request is for information relating to loans, loan agreements and financial arrangements, and only for the dates in question. Cloudflare gave up information without even hesitating, but they're going to spend $6,000 trying to quash this?



Screenshot_1.png


Aw, ghosted, faggot.
 

SFWA liaison

Heidi Hildeman customer
Forum Clout
95,186
you can’t just fund peoples lawsuits and not be liable for repercussions, otherwise people could just maliciously fund anyones retarded legal vendettas purely to fuck with opponents or business rivals.
any legal precedent for this? plenty of NGOs, unions, lobby groups fund all kinds of lawsuits all the time, some of whcih fail. Some litigants even crowdfund, if thousands donate does that mean thousands are on the hook for potential future costs? No way. The mere act of giving money to someone for a lolsuit can't have such a massive string attached automatically.

Frankly even the contract hypothesis seems weird, if Pat has a contract with SFWA that's private between them. Unless Pat showed it to Jen to prove the funds are there, no need to take Susan, as part of a negotiation?
 

FurBurger

What would you do for a Klondike bar?
Forum Clout
22,494
Can someone explain what this is for the 16 year olds who don’t know dick about the legal system?
  1. Quasi's hired a specialist debt lawyer to get money of of Fatrick
  2. That lawyer has asked for a bunch of details on how the SFWA have been spending their money, specifically in relation to Fatrick.
  3. The SFWA are overjoyed by this opportunity to show the court how efficiently and prudently their charity spends its money, and have filed a 76 page document explaining exactly where the money went.

EDIT: I might be slightly wrong about that last bit; it's apparently 76 pages of "No, it's secret"; presumably because kids are so heavily featured in their expenses.
 
Last edited:
Top