WWAW the shroud of Turin being proved true and Jesus looking as he was always depicted / seen in visions.

[NoBacon]

Take your cringe Jewish bullshit depiction and pound sand! That’s what I have to say.

AI shows 'face of Jesus' as Shroud of Turin debate rages | Weird | News | Express.co.uk

EXCLUSIVE: As scientists claim to have 'proven' the Shroud of Turin dates back to Jesus Christ's time, Daily Express has used AI to reveal what he may really have looked like

www.express.co.uk

 

[Uncle J’s Sink Emporium]

Come on, man

 

[Gimli Son Of Gloin]

lol

 

[NoBacon]

Come on, man

They want people to think he was some hunchback little brown guy who looked like a caveman. Fuck that.

 

[Mick_Mickerson]

He definitely would have looked Semetic, but it is possible he had blondish hair. The poor Palestinian guy who was all over the news last weekend who had both his newborn twins and wife killed in an Israeli airstrike had blondish hair, as an example.

He certainly wouldn't have looked like a Norwegian, though.

 

[NoBacon]

He definitely would have looked Semetic, but it is possible he had blondish hair. The poor Palestinian guy who was all over the news last weekend who had both his newborn twins and wife killed in an Israeli airstrike had blondish hair, as an example.

He certainly wouldn't have looked like a Norwegian, though.

He is the son of God, He can look like anything lol.

 

[Mick_Mickerson]

He is the son of God, He can look like anything lol.

Note that his physical description isn't included at all in the Bible or by the apostles, which might suggest he looked rather average or there weren't traits that stuck out enough to mention. If he looked so different from all of his neighbors, wouldn't you think that would be mentioned constantly?

 

[Turk February]

Revelations is the only biblical description, describes his hair as white as snow. Are you taking the Pilates word over the word of God? (Of course you would)

 

[NoBacon]

Note that his physical description isn't included at all in the Bible or by the apostles, which might suggest he looked rather average or there weren't traits that stuck out enough to mention. If he looked so different from all of his neighbors, wouldn't you think that would be mentioned constantly?

No because His appearance is not important at all, but I won’t let Jews try to undermine Christian’s by saying he looks like a tunnel rat under a synagogue.

There’s plenty of contemporary Roman descriptions of him and the shroud of Turin.

 

[wbgreen]

There are plenty of Palestinians with light hair and eyes. The IDF kills them everyday!

 

[Jims_Maroon_Pants]

No because His appearance is not important at all, but I won’t let Jews try to undermine Christian’s by saying he looks like a tunnel rat under a synagogue.

There’s plenty of contemporary Roman descriptions of him and the shroud of Turin.

Jesus looks exactly how the Eastern Roman Empire painted him in the Hagia Sophia
He did not look like a Viking but he also did not look like a money grabber

 

[Mick_Mickerson]

No because His appearance is not important at all, but I won’t let Jews try to undermine Christian’s by saying he looks like a tunnel rat under a synagogue.

There’s plenty of contemporary Roman descriptions of him and the shroud of Turin.

So you dispute that he was a Judean from Galilee? Because if he was a Judean from Galilee, he probably looked like other Judeans from Galilee.

Is your theory that a Norwegian was transported to Judea at that time to serve as the Son of God?

 

[TheRevAlJolson]

It doesn't matter what he looked like, it's the message - forget all that jew law bs and focus on the three things that are important - faith in God, faith in yourself, and faith in your neighbor. That's the only thing that should matter. Of course jews immediately jump on board with making him look like the guy who works at the deli down the street.

 

[NoBacon]

So you dispute that he was a Judean from Galilee? Because if he was a Judean from Galilee, he probably looked like other Judeans from Galilee.

Is your theory that a Norwegian was transported to Judea at that time to serve as the Son of God?

Stay mad about it, we all see what you’re trying to do.

 

[Mick_Mickerson]

Stay mad about it, we all see what you’re trying to do.

I'm not mad in the least, I genuinely don't get why people would refuse to believe he likely looked like other Judeans from Galillee. Which as I said could mean a lot of different things, but it's certainly possible he looked like the description on the left that is making you mad.

 

[Niggerotchi]

"How could he be white if I'm not white"

-Gnome statured non-white O&A fan.

 

[JebJoh]

So you dispute that he was a Judean from Galilee? Because if he was a Judean from Galilee, he probably looked like other Judeans from Galilee.

Is your theory that a Norwegian was transported to Judea at that time to serve as the Son of God?

Much more likely that he didn’t exist at all and this whole myth is nonsense

 

[Mick_Mickerson]

Much more likely that he didn’t exist at all and this whole myth is nonsense

Even among the more cynical historians, the consensus is he existed. There are enough contemporary references in existence

 

[NoBacon]

Much more likely that he didn’t exist at all and this whole myth is nonsense

Why don’t you diddle your kids more?

 

[RoTheHo69]

I think the entire topic of what he looked like is ridiculous. As in the person who started the discussion is being frivolous as becomes the person drawn into this discussion. It should be avoided by the faithful. Would it make you happy if people accepted his message based on his physical appearance? The discussion is a trap for the faithful. Just ignore and reject this shit don't perpetuate frivolous discussion if you're talking about your faith.